| September 30, 2003—For the second
time in as many weeks, state legislators were welcomed into the district
to discuss education
reform efforts in Washington and the nation. The subject that again received
the most interest was the latest revision of Elementary and Secondary
Education Act, known as No Child Left Behind (NCLB).
The lawmakers, including six state legislators
and a candidate for mayor of Renton, were very interested to hear
about obstacles presented
by the federal legislation. Of particular interest was the law’s
disregard for the challenges faced by educators when preparing some
students, such as special education students and those whose first
language is not English, for what Superintendent Dolores Gibbons calls “Universal
Proficiency” (holding all students to the same standard). Another
point of interest was the punitive nature of the mandates.
Superintendent Gibbons told those in attendance,
“
The federal government’s efforts to create “universal access” have
already been established in law through such historic cases as Brown
v. Board of Education, Title IV, the original ESEA, and laws covering
access for immigrant and homeless children. Given these well-defined
laws, the real challenge becomes “universal proficiency”;
all students meeting high standards not just gaining access. The public
school system in this country has spent the last 170 years creating
policy and practice that guarantees equal access. The notion of universal
proficiency is a dramatically different concept. While I welcome the
new concept and can celebrate the laudable Federal goals, there are
technical flaws in some aspects of the current Federal plan.”
She went on to tell them of a newly released Princeton
Review study of all 50 states that ranked Washington among the seven
states “least
likely” to be able to achieve the Federal goals in No Child Left
Behind. The reason for this designation is that Washington standards
are very high. While we have worked well with these high standards,
it has been with the states guidance and help. The Federal sanctions
appear punitive by comparison.
Senator Adam Kline—D, 37th Legislative District,
asked if the legislation sets impossible goals (all students meeting
100% proficiency
by 2014) and therefore gives a false impression of failing schools
in this state.
Superintendent Gibbons gave this example of a school
excelling in state testing while “needing improvement” by NCLB standards:
Dimmitt Middle School serves 920 students, 75% of which are minority
and 60% fall into national poverty standards. A total of 60 students
are non-English speaking proficient and mobility rates are about 25%
per year. An exemplary principal and stable staff runs the school.
Students are engaged, parents are active and the community is supportive.
Last spring this hard working group of educators and students improved
their scores on the state assessment (WASL) by an impressive 60% and
reading by 29%. Yet, by Federal standards, against the “uniform
bar” Dimmitt was named as a “school in improvement.” Measuring
student improvement against themselves with a high standards goal is
ultimately a more powerful reform model.
Two of the legislators have set appointments to return and tour schools
to become more familiar with challenges in Special Education and English
as a Second Language classrooms.
Karen Q. Jones, K-12 math resource teacher and superintendent
intern, prepared the meeting and presented an overview of the district
that
included staffing, demographics, budget considerations, community partnerships
and more.
Those in attendance included Renton school board
members Lynn Desmarais, Joy Poff—both running for re-election in November—and
Marcie Maxwell along with REA president Phyllis Silling and principals
Wanda
Williams-Brown (Lakeridge), Cathie Rondeau (McKnight) and Kathryn Hutchinson
(Renton High).
|